Critical Thinking Scenario Essay

The skills that you cultivate as a vital thinker argon intended to help you think your way through in all of actions situations. One of the most challenging and complex of lifes areas is moral issues and decisions. Every day of your life you make moral choices, decisions that speculate your admit core moral compass. Often we are non advised of the deeper moral values that drive our choices, and we may even be ignorant to the fact that the choices we are making tolerate a moral factor. little thinking plays a major role in assisting us in developing values, using moral reasoning, and to make respect satisfactory conclusions. The steps involved. vital thinking is defined as having the means to articulate what you study, being sluttish to all possibilities and adequate to(p) to draw your own conclusions based on what you have learned. There are six steps to the hypercritical thinking process. The graduation is knowledge you are satisfactory to identify with what you hea r and read, the topic, issues, and main points. footstep two is comprehension, being able to relate to the information and put it into your own words. Step three is application, taking what you have learned and apply it to an positive situation.Step four is analysis, which means breaking the information down to regard how they are connected to other ideas. The final step is evaluation, this occurs when you understand with backup details and you are able to form a conclusion. According to honourable Reasoning A Key Cap business leader (2013), ethical reasoning is the ability to reflect on moral issues in the abstract and in historic narratives within particular traditions. Ethical reasoning is the ability to identify, assess, and develop ethical arguments from a variety of ethical positions (What Counts As Ethical Reasoning?). The principles and rules of critical thinking are applicable to ethical reasoning beca single-valued function they both permit individuals to distinguish more than one side of a dilemma. If everyone followed the rules and guidelines of logic, there would restrained be a need for ethical decision making because form depends on an individuals desire to avoid punishment. When an organization or societyrelies on that method of doing the right thing to avoid yucky consequences, the focus of its effort to promote ethical conduct undermines the effort by promoting misperception.The participants in the Blood Money scenario consists of the Media, The U.S. Government, China, Transplant Traffickers, Doctors, Victims, Prisoners and Army agencies. The medical avocation is responsible for actively promoting ethical standards in medicine to ensure the beat practices. The government and military have a responsibility to set forrad laws that protect all individuals, prisoners and all. Healthcare workers, should also specify the dangers of organ trafficking and the wellness risks involved. The ones that are conducting the sales should understan d that that could be them in the position of the prisoners and their organs are taken without their permission. The victims responsibility is to make sure their physician is extremely regarded and against those practices. The stakeholders have also failed morally, as they would have prevented this from happening by not involving their interests into that area of spotlight.The moral dilemma is that is it right to take an organ from a prisoner who has done disparage and that be the ultimate punishment? Or, is it wrong to make money off the actions and build a thriving resistivity business? The conflict is that there are so numerous time lag for organ transplant that it does not seem harmful for those that will be killed or dead that no longer would have a use for the organs. The best outcome would be to set laws that protect the military from negotiating standards with hospitals to stage them with immediate access to organs. Initiate programs within the country that people augu ry whether or not if they would like to donate their organs to someone in the event they die. After reading the transcripts and watching the video I was able to get supporting details from all characters that were involved.The relevance of the criteria was that the government knows rough what is happening but they tend to turn the other cheek with no regard for human life. Sacrificing human beings is considered a taboo in many countries, but many would not want to believe thats what it is. The viable courses of action would be to contact the government officials and deal with the consequences head-on. Ethically we all have to identify with the three main principles of life justice, sufficiency, and solidarity. I was able to see the viewpoints of each side and that helped me reach my conclusion without being bias. The critical thinking process is importantbecause, it allows a neutral standpoint and able to reach a conclusion and determine based solely on the facts.ReferencesEthical Reasoning A Key Capability. (2013). Retrieved from http//www.wesleyan.edu/ethics/reason.html Pearson Learning Solutions (2014). award-winning Investigation Blood Money Video file. Retrieved from Pearson website https//media.pearsoncmg.com/pls/us/phoenix/1269738887/ANN_11-20-06_BloodMoney.html Ruggiero, V.R. (2015). Thinking critically About Ethical Issues (9th ed.). New York, NY McGraw-Hill Education.