Narcotic Drugs

In this paper I depart discuss the details the classification of somniferous doses in criminal law, forensic certify indispensablenessed to obtain a conviction in a drug case. The term narcotic implies a state of lethargy or sluggishness. Pharmacologists classify narcotic drugs as substance that shore relief from pain and produce sleep. Unfortunately narcotic has come to be popularly associated with any drugs that is socially unacceptable, as a consequence of this incorrect usage many drug are improperly call narcotics. almost drug laws in the fall in States incorrectly designated marijuana as a narcotic even now many drug controlled laws in the United States including federal law, classify cocaine as a narcotic drug (Saferstein 2011, p193). A large number of drug users are in mundane contact with a range of criminal justice organizations. The police employ laws relating to illegal drugs and unlawful activities that surround drug use. It is important to recognize that kin between drug and villainy are unclear.Drug use leads to horror second crimes leads to drug use and third drugs and crime are cerebrate to social force (Hughes, p, 75, 2006). When a forensic chemist picks up a drug specimen for analysis, he or she can expect to take chances just about anything, so all contingencies essential be ready for. The analysis must leave no room for error because its results get out have a direct bearing on the march of witness the guilt or innocence of a defendant.There is no tenderness ground in drug identification either the specimen is a specific drug or its not and once a dictatorial conclusion is drawn, the chemist must prepared to support and define the rigour of the results in the court of law (Saferstein 2011, p204). When someone is accused of a crime involving drugs, more than likely the drugs were taken from their person or property leave go from hand to hand as they are processed, analyzed, stored, and sent to the motor lodge as evid ence.Every time a change of hands occurs, it must be documented to ensure that the evidence was not tampered with or handled negligently. The process that evidence goes through from the time it is seized to the time it reaches the courtroom is called the kitchen stove of custody. Implementing strand of custody is necessary its the start of the foundation of the evidence in question, by showing the absence of alteration, substitution, or change of condition.Specifically, foundation attestation for tangible evidence requires that exhibits be identified as being in substantially the same condition as they were at the time the evidence was seized, and that the exhibit has remained in that condition through an unbroken kitchen range of custody. For example, hypothesize that in a prosecution for possession of illegal narcotics, police police sergeant A recovers drugs from the defendant A gives police officer B the drugs B then gives the drugs to police scientist C, who conducts an a nalysis of the drugs C gives the drugs to police detective D, who brings the drugs to court.The attestation of A, B, C, and D constitute a chain of custody for the drugs, and the prosecution would need to offer testimony by each person in the chain to establish both the condition and identification of the evidence, unless the defendant stipulated as to the chain of custody in order to save time. Conclusion Narcotic drugs will forever be around. Its a complex problem passim society. It affects people from the newborn stage to old age. Narcotic drugs, takes an enormous ships bell on lives and communities, especially in developing countries and its contribution to the overall outcome and will to increase in the future.